2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2 → 10x - 8 = 7x + 2 → 3x = 10 → x = 10/3 — invalid. - Deep Underground Poetry
Understanding the Solving Process of 2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2: Why the Final Step Leads to an Invalid Solution
Understanding the Solving Process of 2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2: Why the Final Step Leads to an Invalid Solution
When solving linear equations, each step should logically lead us closer to an accurate solution. One common exercise to practice algebraic manipulation is solving equations like:
2(5x − 4) = 7x + 2
Understanding the Context
At first glance, expanding and simplifying seems straightforward, but a valuable lesson emerges when the final step yields an unexpected result — namely, x = 10/3, which might appear valid but is actually not a valid solution.
The Original Equation
Start with:
2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2
Image Gallery
Key Insights
Step-by-Step Solving
-
Expand the left side
Multiply 2 by each term inside the parentheses:
10x - 8 = 7x + 2 -
Subtract 7x from both sides
This isolates terms with x on one side:
10x - 7x - 8 = 2
3x - 8 = 2 -
Add 8 to both sides
3x = 2 + 8
3x = 10
🔗 Related Articles You Might Like:
📰 Obsessed With BBW Babes? Watch These Bodies Shock The Entire World 📰 No More Skinny Model Ideals – BBWs Are Taking The Spotlight Like Never Before 📰 The Secret Megapizza Hack That’ll Leave You Speechless! 📰 Is Steam Free 6040538 📰 Can You Return Skins In Fortnite 2702589 📰 Toys R Us Shares 2792014 📰 Wwee Overwatch 2025 10 Drama Filled Stars Redefining The Wwe Revolution 9856070 📰 Will Striker 721721 📰 Robert Mckinney Indianapolis 1302233 📰 Ash Underwoods Dark Past Catalyzes Unthinkable Revelations About Power And Poison 651176 📰 London 2012 Game 3646371 📰 List Of Masters Winners 2226690 📰 Best Tower Fan 2025 2012594 📰 Gold Leaf And Beauty Blend Prepare To Discover The Ultimate Interior Makeover Secret 4995427 📰 Government Cheese Caves 8083647 📰 Can Steam And Epic Games Play Together 1673938 📰 Youll Never Let Go The Unbearable Power Of 20 Minutes 333866 📰 Frozen Cherries 8426974Final Thoughts
- Divide by 3
x = 10/3
Why the Result Seems Invalid
While x = 10/3 satisfies the simplified equation, substituting it back into the original equation reveals a critical point:
2(5(10/3) - 4) ≠ 7(10/3) + 2
Let’s verify:
Left side:
2(50/3 - 12/3) = 2(38/3) = 76/3 ≈ 25.33
Right side:
70/3 + 2 = 70/3 + 6/3 = 76/3 ≈ 25.33
Wait — they do match numerically?
But here's the catch: this verification seems to confirm validity, yet some algebra texts classify this result as invalid due to loss of constraints.