Question: What is the smallest three-digit number divisible by both 19 and 29, representing the optimal number of satellite sensors for a glacier monitoring system?

Sun, 03 May 2026 23:34:17 +0000

**What is the smallest three-digit number divisible by both 19 and 29, representing the optimal number of satellite sensors for a glacier monitoring system?**
This precise number—595—represents more than just a math solution. It highlights how advanced calculations guide real-world applications, like optimizing satellite sensor networks used in climate monitoring. As global interest in glacier preservation intensifies, even small numerical identifiers now carry outsized significance in science and technology. ### Why This Number Is Gaining Attention in the US
The push to understand glacier behavior has become urgent amid climate change. Satellite data offers a scalable way to track ice melt, terrain shifts, and environmental trends. Choosing the smallest three-digit number divisible by both 19 and 29 offers a practical benchmark—one that supports efficient, reliable sensor deployment. This kind of precise numeracy fuels smarter planning for systems monitoring Earth’s most fragile regions, especially in polar and alpine zones. ### How This Number Actually Works
To find the smallest three-digit number divisible by both 19 and 29, we calculate the least common multiple (LCM). These two primes yield LCM = 19 × 29 = 551—well within the three-digit range. Less than 551 is too small, so 551 emerges as a balanced, efficient number. Not only does it divide cleanly into three-digit datasets, but it also supports modular sensor networks that simplify data analysis and reduce redundancy. This balance makes it a logical choice when designing scalable, responsive monitoring systems. ### Common Questions Readers Want to Know
**What makes 595 special for glacier monitoring?** It’s not arbitrary—it’s mathematically efficient. Minimal and clean, it enables cost-effective deployment of a sensor array that balances coverage and redundancy. **Is there a better number?** Of the three-digit numbers divisible by both 19 and 29, 551 is the first, making it optimal by definition. **How does this support scientific accuracy?** Using numbers with no repeating factors ensures data integrity and avoids algorithmic bias in sensor placement models.